U403 Emergency shut-valve
U403 Series Emergency Shut-off Valve are installed on fuel supply lines beneath at grade level to minimize hazards associated with collision or fire at the dispenser. If the dispenser is pulled over or dislodged by collision, the top of the valve breaks off the flow of fuel. Single-poppet models shut off supply flow, while double-poppet models shut off supply as well as prevent release of fuel from the dispenser's internal piping. The base of the Emergency Valve is securely anchored to the concrete dispenser island through a stabilizer bar system within a U-Bolt Assembly. Valve inlet (bottom) connection are female pipe threads and outlet (top) connections are available with female threads, male threads, or a union fitting. Other options include suction system models with a normally closed secondary poppet which maintain prime, and models with external threads on inlet body which connect to secondary containment system.
Materials:
Body: cast iron(Spray-paint)
Surface: electronic Nickel plated
Seal : Buna-N O-ring
Features :
Flow rate: 0- 120 L/M
Working pressure: 0.2Mpa
Valve closing speed: 0.5s
Lowest shut-off temperature: 75 â„?
Medium: water, gasoline, diesel, and kerosene
Operating Environment: -30 ~+55degree
Fire Protection- a fusible link trips the valve closed at 75 to shut off fuel
supply to the dispense.
Integral Test Port - a 3/8" Test Port allows the piping system to be air tested
without breaking any piping connection.
Low-Profile Tops- Female and Union-top double-poppet valves have a low-profile top to allow upgrading from single-poppet valves without changing existing piping.
100% Factory Tested.
Replacement Parts:
Key Description Weight
1 Protect pin
1 Cap(Single) 0.795kg
2 Cap(Double) 0.895kg
Package:
Net Weight Cross Weight Dimension
18kg/case of 6 20kg/case of 6 37.5x13.5x39 cm /case of 6
we are committed to create the best workplace, encourage our staffs to put their own personalities into their jobs, and provide them a stage to show themselves.
ief executive, who one way or another gets the
people he wants nominated, reckons Lucian Bebchuk of Harvard Law School, the chief academic advocate of
changing the rules to make shareholder democracy more effective. In a recent paper, “The Myth of the
Shareholder Franchise� Mr Bebchuk noted that during 1996-2004, incumbents faced rival slates from candidates
seeking to run the firm as a stand-alone entity on only 108 occasions—about 12 companies a year (see chart).
Companies with a stockmarket value of more than $200m (still quite small) endured just 17 such contests, only
two of which were succes fuel dispenser sful.
Nor is it easy for shareholders to remove an official nominee for the
board by casting their votes against him. Under today s rules, only votes
in favour count votes against or withheld are ignored. Under this
“plurality�system, a single supporting vote may get a director elected.
This system came under scrutiny in 2004 when 45% of the votes cast
by Disney shareholders did not support the re-election to the board of
the entertainment firm s then boss, Michael Eisner. Those who favour
greater shareholder power can take some comfort from the fact that
this marked the beginning of the end for Mr Eisner at Disney—though he
and his board would have been fully within their rights to ignore this
almost unprecedented shareholder rebellion.
Introducing majority voting is the aim of many of the resolutions being
filed by shareholders in this proxy season. Ballots for majority voting
will be held at 119 companies, according to Richard Ferlauto of the
American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees
(AFSCME), a union with an activist pension fund that is seen as the
leader of this campaign. Intriguingly, some companies tried to take the
heat out of the campaign by offering to adopt a voluntary “director resignation�policy. Although the existing voting
system would remain in p fuel dispenser lace, a candidate receiving less than 50% of votes cast would offer to resign.
Shareholde fuel dispenser
